AllahPundit over at HotAir posted an interview by Bill O’Reilly of Johnny Sutton, the US Attorney who successfully prosecuted the case against the two border patrol agents who shot a fleeing illegal immigrant drug runner.

Items like this have me wondering who is the biggest scumbag of them all-

1) The border patrol agents who unload 15 rounds at a fleeing Mexican drug runner on the US side of the border (wounding him with the one shot that actually hit)… and then attempting to cover it up by removing evidence? Bad move, in hindsight

2) The Mexican drug runner who was plying his trade across the border

3) The ACLU and other such traitors who saw to it that the Mexican drug runner gets a $5 MILLION dollar settlement for having his civil rights shot in the butt (and I say: exactly what “civil rights” is an illegal alien - who is fleeing arrest - entitled to? The only right he should have gotten is a more well aimed bullet to the spleen.

4) The misinformation to the jury by the jury foreman about how the judge would not accept a hung jury

5) The jury, for possibly rushing to a guilty verdict so they could get back to thier lives

6) The judge, for passing a disproportionately severe sentence (unless it was one of those wacky mandatory sentence crimes)

7) Johnny “Law”, i.e. Johnny Sutton, the prosecuting US Attorney who seems more interested in catering to the Mexican Drug Cartel is better than protecting American citizens - and now has opened the door to effectively disarm, if not disband, the Border Patrol, and certainly facilitate more illegal migrations and drug traffic over what remains of the border.

Hell, just declare the border null and void at this point.

8) The Official Party Line that making life difficult for illegal Mexican immigrants is a no-no… after all, we simply cannot live without NAFTA, FTAA, or the SPP… can we?