Welcome to Seeker's Jar! Unashamedly Pro-American, Pro-Christian, and Opposed to Dhimmitude and Socialism.

In the News!27 September 2006 7:21 pm

Ya gotta love surveys.

Just when we thought that the much publicized* "statistic" that circulated much in gay pop culture and/or GLAAD/PLAG literature about how 10% of men are gay had finally been sealed up and buried away alongside the remains of Mr. Ed (the horse, of course), we have another "ten percent" issue coming to the surface.

To wit, I give you:

A survey of New York City men finds that nearly one in 10 who identify themselves as "straight" have sex only with other men. About 70 percent of these men are married. Ten percent of all married men reported have sex with men during the past year.


Linked article at: All Headline News 

Taken out of its context, that sounds pretty durn conclusive, doesn’t it?  Of course, this study was done in a pool of around 4200 men in New York City (arguably, one expects to find a much higher precentage of gays in any Western major city, especially one that is considered a gay mecca).  I think that this is a bit misleading.

Perhaps "closeted gay men" would be a fairer term to assign to these individuals… since as far as I knew, a man who sleeps only with other men is pretty much by any definition… a gay man.   

 

 

 

*The source of the much-discussed "gay 10%" was derived from the Kinsey Study conducted some 50-60 years ago. The survey population consisted of convicted felons serving long-length sentences.  Can’t imagine that there wouldn’t be a much higher than normal amount of homosexual contact going on there, no? The flip side of that is that most likely very few of those men would have actively identified themselves as gay, and probably did not have a preference for men over women: their choice in the matter was rather limited. Moreover, I would say that they were performing (forcible prison rape) their roles more to establish their power structure than for sexual release.

Baby Talk... baby!21 September 2006 4:39 pm

I was going to use this space for a rather lengthy rant about radical Islamism… but something much better came along.

 

12 Sept. 2006

Baby Leo 

Baby Leo

Welcome to the world, my little one. 

Linux/Computer Geeky Stuff11 September 2006 5:40 pm

Following is a "How To" for installing HandBrake, a clever little DVD-to-computer file ripper. Which of course, is quite handy for backing up your existing DVD collection (as opposed to those Netflix rented *ahem* DVDs).

I originally posted this on the Ubuntu forums as a mash-up of all the tutorials and posts I located on the net in my quest to get HandBrake up and running… credits given to authors below. 

  • This is primarily geared toward Linux users (Ubuntu or Debian in particular, although any Debian based distro like MEPIS, Xandros, Linspire, etc that uses aptitude/apt-get could make it work from these directions)
  • For Fedora Core amd other RPM based distros… this HOWTO may not work as intended. I recommend checking your distro’s forums and package manager for codecs and things like the Jam compiler. 
  • Mac owners (PPC or MacTel) might be more interested in the GUI version available at http://handbrake.m0k.org/?page_id=24
  • Windows users: If you are willng to "experiment", there is an .exe being built. Details are on the HandBrake forums (you may need to register with the forums to see this link).

 

HandBrake 0.7.1 CLI "HOWTO"


Well… there are a handful of howto’s spread around the net for building HandBrake in Ubuntu Linux… but as I have a rather nasty habit of tinkering and (attempting to) tweaking my Linux installs until something breaks horrendously (enough for me to need to re-install the OS)…

Much of it is derived from Mayank Sharma’s tutorial at http://www.linux.com/article.pl?sid=06/04/13/2139238 entitled "CLI Magic: Porting DVDs with HandBrake", but as I ran into a few rough bumps with it…

Here is what I did (again, this is pieced together from a few different HOWTOs) to get it running on my aging machine running Dapper:

-1. Download the source tarball:

Code:
wget -c http://download.m0k.org/handbrake/HandBrake-0.7.1.tar.gz

-2. Install these packages to make the HandBrake happy in its new (Ubuntu/Debian) home:
Code:
sudo aptitude updatesudo aptitude install jam build-essential nasm libdvdcss2

-3. Unzipped/un-tarred it in your home directory:
Code:
tar xvf HandBrake-0.7.1.tar.gz

-4. Rename the HandBrake-0.7.1 directory to HandBrake (trivial, but who really wants to type out all that version info in the path! )
Code:
mv HandBrake-0.7.1 HandBrake

-5. Switch to the HandBrake directory
Code:
cd HandBrake

-6. Configure the source
Code:
./configure

-7. Edit the Jamfile to make Ubuntu/Debian happy: (use your favorite text editor)
Code:
sudo nano ~./HandBrake/libhb/Jamfile

-8. Find the following line: (it should be near the bottom of the file)
Code:
ObjectCcFlags $(LIBHB_SRC) : -I$(TOP)/contrib/include ;

–8a. Make it look like this:
Code:
ObjectCcFlags $(LIBHB_SRC) : -I$(TOP)/contrib/include -I$(TOP)/contrib/mpeg4ip/lib/mp4v2 ;

–8b. Save/Write-out of the file…

-9. Jam it all together (requires installation of Jam, see #2 above)

Code:
jam

-10. Finishing up:
Code:
cp HBTest /usr/local/bin/handbrake

This allows you to pass commands to handbrake anywhere in a terminal.

For the record, this rips movies/DVDs to a suitable *.avi or *.mpg slightly faster on my old Compaq Presario running Dapper than the full-on GUI version does in Mac OSX on my fresh-from-the-Apple Store MacBook.

Credits go to Peter James Bui, jbird123 from the Ubuntu forums, and Mayank Sharma as mentioned above.

And of course, the coders who put HandBrake together.

I may re-post some helpful instructions for using the CLI (Command Line Interface) if I get permission from the author… it will help explain the somewhat mysterious commands HandBrake uses.

In the meantime, there is always the "help" operator: 

Code:
handbrake -h
This will display the list of commands and operators with some fair amount of detail.

 

In the News! 2:54 am

Ever notice that the news media seems to like provocative titles?

For example, this article in "Cosmos" Magazine:

Christians attack hominids in Kenya museum

Oh noes! Those naughty Christians are up to no good again.

Exactly what is that trying to evoke? Now, perhaps this is my twisted mind jumping to conclusions… but the first thing that hit me was the mental picture of a bunch of rioters thrashing museum displays of dead monkeys.

Naturally, I just had to clickie on the link. Turns out that the item was actually quite tame, just a few people protesting about an evolution-themed display in a particularly noteworthy museum.

 

Of course, I shouldn’t have expected the mainstream media to take a favorable view of things alongside Christians… after all, if it weren’t for the media, I never would have learned that "the majority of the world accepts evolution as scientific fact".

Yeah, sure. 

I used to be an ardent believer in evolution (particularly the whole monkey-business of us coming from Chimps and Australopithecuses)… and when I tried to explain this to my fellow airman who I served with (around 15 years ago) I was nearly laughed out of the room.

Mind you, none of those airman were in the least what you could call "devout" Christians.

I still think that while in this sinful world, some *darwinian principles" might apply in terms of the stronger species surviving (in fact, I could think of one or two Bible verses that support this idea in this present age)…

But to believe that we evolved from sea slime into salamanders, and then from chinchillas to chimpanzees and finally, Homo sapiens… takes at least as much faith as accepting the idea of a soveriegn God creating and propagating the human races through Adam.

Gratuitous Junk! Woohoo!1 September 2006 5:59 am

I was never much of a comic book reader, much less a collector. Most of my reading falls into the Star Wars graphic novels (particularly the Clone Wars collection) which is best done ala mooch-reading-at-Barnes & Noble while the wife is off shopping (and quite possibly making a better investment of her time, and of course, our money).

My first comics I remember reading around age six or seven… were from my parents’ collections. Well, they weren’t so much of a collection as they were several recurring titles in no particular order.  Sadly, most of these perished in our various overseas moves between the US and Germany.

The titles they like to read were probably geared more to an adult audience … as they were somewhat morbid or (to my young eyes) rather scary affairs like Jonah Hex or Ghost Rider, and those old Captain America issues where he was fighting against the Nazis and Red Skull - occassionally with Union Jack

The scarier stuff creeped me out sufficiently not to bother with them until many years later stuff like Tales from the Crypt and its related franchises. That, and it almost seems that the artwork from that era was just right for conveying that scary edge.

A few were positively campy (and for some reason , I was vaguely aware of campiness, even if I did not know the proper word for it) such as Iron Fist.

Iron Fist was a Caucasian kung-fu master in this green and yellow outfit that was quite queer and funky for its time… oh wait, that was in 1975. It seems that most things were a bit more queer and funkier. Yet the dude wore skin tight capri pants, lemon yellow slippers, and the pimpest butterfly collar ever… as part of his costume:


 

I mean, one had to possess a certain amount of personal courage to wear that get-up. Of course, if I were a (superpowered?) kung fu master with a killer physique… I probably would not worry much about what people thought of my costume either. 

And of course, no comic "collection" would be complete without Superman. In what was probably my first subconcious identification with (albeit comic based) sexuality… Supes stood out head and feet above the rest. In fact, he was probably overdone in his hypermasculinity, save only for the outrageous ultra-muscularity of selected characters like Hulk or Juggernaut.  Before the first Superman movie debuted, I had already built up this mental image of what Superman in the flesh would look like: needless to say, when Christopher Reeve donned the super-suit for the silver screen* I was a little disappointed. Arnold Schwartzenegger might have better fit my mold of Superman (in terms of physique at least), but he was being cast as Conan around that same time, or collecting bodybuilding titles.

After much discussion of the current user of the super-suit… in particular, Mr. Brandon Routh’s alleged over-endowments… this has lead me to look at the artwork a little more closely than I had done in the past.

Within the mainstream of industrial comic book artistry… very, very few male characters have a bulge. By contrast, most female characters have boobs you could poke your eyes out with if you weren’t careful. 

Okay, I am not looking for anything along the lines of Joe Phillips (his work tends toward the opposite end of the illustration of malehood) or the like… but if you are out saving the world from itself and the occassional super villian dressed in tights, one would expect there to be at least the suggestion of something down there.

Although some artists are working on that item. Take this guy (Northstar) who is one of the first out-of-closet gay superheroes to be regularly featured… and the faintest hint of something in his pants.

 

I would guess that the disproportionate balance of lean body mass (huge muscles) vs. minimized wee-wee will likely remain a feature of male comic characters. I would reckon that the industry and the artists would draw some heat for drawing a character with a cruise missile in his tights. 

That is probably a good thing then … I am not so sure I would have handled a Brandon Routh sized package in my 1970s Superman comics very well.  After all, kids do read these things… and often from a very early age.

Side note: Ever notice that almost all drawings of a superhero/villian just standing around almost show the fists closed in a loose grip, with the forefinger extending over the thumb? Check out Northstar’s right hand. I learned that this is a gimmick most comic illustrators use in case they need to draw in a weapon of some sort (usually a gun) or other object on short notice.

It is also a good thing that we kids do not read between the lines as we will later learn to do. I am sure that the writers meant this in all innocence… :

 

(my apologies to whoever’s blog I found this on… but it was too funny not to share elsewhere). Poor Bats… between that horribly campy 1960s show and the Saturday morning cartoons from the 1970s, neither he nor his alter ego have outgrown thier (apparent) pederastic tendencies. Imagine the scandal it would cause the Wayne Foundation if it were ever leaked to the press that Bruce Wayne was a card-carrying member of NAMBLA…

At least Aqualad and Bucky (Capt. America’s sidekick) were retired somewhere between the Golden and SIlver Ages, before our current jaded generation started making such conclusions. Tsk, sign of the times, I suppose. :P  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*Technically speaking, I did not see the first two Superman movies until returning to the USA in 1980, and possibly not until the widespread distribution of VCRs.  I do vaguely remember seeing Superman II in a theathre…